Private Persons Income in Canada Income Tax Act

Debbie Anderson No Income Source As Tax Evasion Defence
August 9, 2017
Robert Marquis Passes Away – Is Income Tax Unconstitutional?
August 28, 2017
Show all

Private Persons Income in Canada Income Tax Act

 

Canada’s Income Tax Act (“ITA”) finally recognizes private persons income. The ITA’s July 1, 2017 amendment states income benefits private persons unless such persons receive government benefits. Canada Pension Plan (“CPP”) is a government benefit. Otherwise, it is the private property of private persons. This corroborates Apu’s Theory on how Canada’s income tax seems to really work.

Canada’s Income Tax Act (“ITA”) now recognizes private persons income. The ITA’s July 1, 2017 amendment states income benefits private persons unless they receive government benefits. Canada Pension Plan is a government benefit. Otherwise, it is private property as private persons income. This corroborates Apu’s Theory on how Canada’s income tax seems to really work. Picture credit: FATF

Private Persons Income – Summary

Canada’s Income Tax Act (“ITA”) now recognizes private persons income. A July 2017 amendment states income benefits private persons unless they receive government benefits. Canada Pension Plan (“CPP”) is a government benefit. So is almost everything on CRA T1 forms. This corroborates Apu’s Theory on how Canada’s income tax seems to really work.

Private Persons Income – Background

The Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF) was established by the 1989 G-7 Summit. The FATF has 37 members, including Canada. It responds to money laundering. ITA Section 270 to 280 is titled, “Common Reporting Standard”. It is for Canada complying with FATF recommendations. They are the International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism and Proliferation.

ITA Section 270 complies with FATF standards on combating money laundering

Private Persons Income in Canada’s ITA

The definition of “government entityin ITA Section 270 (click to download 3-page highlighted PDF) states,

(i) income is deemed not to inure to the benefit of private persons if such persons are the intended beneficiaries of a governmental program and the program activities are performed for the general public with respect to the common welfare or relate to the administration of government, and

(ii) income is deemed to inure to the benefit of private persons if the income is derived from the use of a governmental entity to conduct a commercial business that provides financial services to private persons.

Duhaime’s online law dictionary says “inure” means, “To take effect, to result; to come into operation.”

Private Persons Income is Basis of Apu’s Theory

Apu’s Theory concludes Canada’s ITA deems individual income as Canada’s “public money” for a federal CPP/ITA “officer”. Such an officer  is a “beneficiary of a governmental program”. Therefore, receiving CPP means such an officer’s income is not private persons income as their private property. (So is every benefit on CRA T1 forms.) ITA Section 270 reduces obfuscation in Canada’s ITA. This means self-assessment includes assessing whether it is private persons income or “public money” for Canada’s office. This is Bill Mori’s legal argument for the Tax Court of Canada. It also was Bob and Terry Steinkey’s position in their tax evasion trial.

Receiving CPP means such an officer’s income is not private persons income (as their private property)

Private Persons Income – Conclusion

ITA Section 270 corroborates Apu’s Theory on how Canada’s income tax seems to really work.

Share this info!

Apu
Apu

4 Comments

  1. […] After 100 years, Canada’s Department of Finance still refuses to explain how the ITA really works. For example, only recently, on July 1, 2017, they amended the ITA and finally used the SIN as a “social insurance number” styled in all lower case. The amendment also refers to private property (as property benefiting a private person). […]

  2. […] July 1, 2017 the ITA started recognizing private person property. And stealing a private person’s private property is a Criminal Code offence. So how does Her […]

  3. […] reporting all income as Canada’s “public money”. It then is no longer your private property. Apu’s Theory concludes income tax is a privilege access fee for using benefits, such as Canada […]

  4. […] our earlier article, the Charter, s.15(1), recognizes natural or private persons of full capacity have inalienable human […]

Leave a Reply