William Russell Tax Court Package Online at Scribd

Canadian Human Rights Vary, Depending on “You”
August 24, 2018
Due Process Ignored by MeToo and CRA
October 1, 2018
Show all

William Russell Tax Court Package Online at Scribd

Dr. William Russell. Picture: www.askdrbill.com

Dr. William Russell appealed to Tax Court of Canada. Picture: www.askdrbill.com

William Russell Tax Court Order: Summary

It seems the William Russell Tax Court order validates Apu’s Theory, our research on Canadian individual income tax. That is because the Tax Court of Canada first acknowledges William Russell’s pleaded facts must be “assumed to be true”. But then it illegally changed his facts to justify the order for Canada! In other words, if the court had not changed his facts, it would have ruled for him. In short, the court deliberately ignored case law precedents and the rule of law. That is why we are exposing the corruption by posting it all online.

 

The court ignored case law precedents and the rule of law to rule for CRA

 

Background

Tax Court of Canada's judges. Judge Valerie Miller issued the order against William Russell.

Tax Court of Canada Justice Valerie Miller issued the order against William Russell. Photo credit: Balfour

The William Russell v. The Queen[1] Tax Court appeal is the first case applying “Apu’s Theory[2]”, our research on Canadian individual income tax. We continue researching because, over 100 years later, it seems Canada still does not tell even lawyers and accountants how it really works. Apu’s Theory is not saying the present dogma is wrong, but that both can co-exist.

As a result, Canada is using the William Russell Tax Court order to imply Apu’s Theory is wrong[3]. But download and read the rest of the story. Find out how it seems to validate it!

 

Canada is using the Russell court order to imply Apu’s Theory is wrong

 

William Russell Court Order: Blocks Appeal From Going to Trial

Since this order blocked William Russell’s appeal from going to trial, no court decision can be made on his pleaded facts based on Apu’s Theory. It also blocks you from finding out what really happened.

That is why the package online includes William Russell’s submissions. Now, you can compare, side-by-side, his pleaded facts versus the ones the court changed, and then used against him. Our 9-page analysis is at Tab B. We call it “Apu’s Theory, Part 4”. After reading them, you might conclude Apu’s Theory could be correct.

 

The Russell court order blocks you from finding out what really happened

 

William Russell Tax Court Order: Online at Scribd

The William Russell Tax Court package is at Scribd.com

The William Russell Tax Court package is at Scribd.com

Download the William Russell Tax Court package here on Scribd. It is a 337-page, 44 MB PDF file.

 

  1. William Russell v. Her Majesty The Queen, 2016 TCC 122 (CanLII).
  2. Apu’s Theory, Part 1, aka Unreported Income Not on a CRA T1 Form is Not Always Tax Evasion; https://ssrn.com/abstract=2800623; Apu’s Theory, Part 2: Attorning to Canada’s Income Tax Act Office (or, Why Is the Name in All Caps?)https://ssrn.com/abstract=2801642; Apu’s Theory, Part 3: see https://canadaincometaxislegal.is/apus-theory-part-3-released/.
  3. R. v. XXXXXXXX, 2017 BCSC 2585 (under publication ban), at paragraphs 170,171,184.

Share this info!

Apu
Apu